In the very early hours of this morning (local) predominately Turkish and
American troops began an intense artillery barrage against the northern Iraqi
city of Mosul.
This was almost immediately followed by an intense series of
primarily American airstrikes against the city which has been occupied by the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) since the summer of 2014.
This
overnight barrage almost immediately started rumours that an operation to
liberate Mosul was under way. After all that would fit in perfectly with the
detailed battle plan that was published in the October 8th (8/10/16) edition of
the unapologetically pro-ISIL "The Economist" magazine.
That of course
was the same edition in which they invited US President Barack Obama to write a
guest column to extol the virtues of his self-proclaimed American economic
miracle. I'll leave you to guess who they're endorsing to be the next President
of the US.
In the defence of Mosul ISIL have erected multiple rings of defensive
lines. The first of these is a moat reminiscent of the Prophet's siege of
Medina filled with oil. Yesterday (15/10/16) ISIL set fire to that oil
producing both a wall of fire and a smokescreen. Behind that moat the next
layer of defence is a complex network of tunnels and bunkers similar to those
used by the Viet Cong during the Vietnam war.
So before any ground troops enter
Mosul the US will have to do exactly what it is condemning Russia for doing in
the eastern part of Syria's Aleppo City. Intense air and artillery strikes to destroy
that network of tunnels and bunkers along with other defensive positions such
as trenches.
We all ready know when the US thinks this period of softening up
will be complete and ground troops will be able advance into Mosul.
Recep Tayyip
Erdogan the President/Prime Minister/Emperor of the US' supposed ally Turkey
told the World when it will be all the way back on September 25th (25/9/16). It
will be at dawn (local) on Wednesday (19/10/16) - the day of the third and
final US Presidential debate.
Sadly only yesterday (15/10/16) we were given
further evidence of just how woefully unprepared Iraq is to launch an
operation to liberate Mosul.
Yesterday (15/10/16) the wife and children of the
head of one of the tribes making up the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF)
militia were killed in an ISIL attack in the home in Tikrit. Predominately but
not exclusively Shia the PMF make up part of the Iraq Security Forces (ISF).
Along
with Kirkuk and Baiji Tikrit makes up one point of what is known as the Hawija
triangle. Sitting around 150km (90 miles) north of Baghdad and around 215km
(130 miles) south of Mosul ISIL's continued occupation of the Hawija triangle
has been a persistent problem since Tikrit itself was liberated all the way
back in April 2015.
Also yesterday (15/10/16) 41 civilians were killed and 33
others wounded in an ISIL attack inside Baghdad itself. Those killed were
returning from a pilgrimage marking the Shia holy day of Ashura. On the
northern outskirts of the city another ISIL attack against a police checkpoint
killed 8 and wounded 11.
It is quite hard to say where ISIL are launching these
attacks from. Obviously it seems extremely likely that the attack in Tikrit was
launched from the Hawija triangle. However despite recent gains ISIL continue to
maintain a presence with the south-western Anbar province and in and around
Saladin and Diyala provinces just to the north of Baghdad.
It was only yesterday
(15/10/16) that the ISF was able to liberate the Haditha to Baiji Highway 19
road in Anbar province from ISIL. Some 150km (90 miles) long this road links
ISIL's remaining positions in Anbar with ISIL positions in the Hawija triangle.
Although the liberation of the road makes it harder for ISIL to travel between
Anbar and Hawija as I'm sure Jeep, Toyota or Land Rover will attest you don't
need a road to drive from one place to another.
The argument the US will put
forward to support the Mosul operation is that the liberation of Mosul will
make it harder for ISIL to mount attacks from Anbar, the Hawija triangle or the
areas on the outskirts of Baghdad. This is simply not true.
Both the attack in
Tikrit and the attack on Ashura pilgrims were carried out by suicide bombers.
In order to carry out this type of attack you need at most 1kg (2lbs) of high
explosives. If the explosive in question is something like TATP you’re
talking about an object the size of a small bag of flour. If the explosive is
something like military grade TNT you’re talking about an object the size of a
small pack of butter.
These handheld objects are obviously incredibly easy to
hide in a vehicles spare tyre, gas tanks, door panels or any load the vehicle
could be carrying such as large sacks of flour.
Apart from the fact that
explosives are very easy to smuggle ISIL has likely built up arsenals of
weapons in areas such as the Hawija triangle or Anbar either hidden in
buildings or buried in oil drums in the desert. Just on Friday (14/10/16) a British Royal
Marine reservist was convicted of stealing weapons and stashing them in just
such a hide in the New Forest in Hampshire.
Obviously it is not practical
to stop every vehicle travelling everywhere in Iraq and then disassemble both
it and its cargo to make sure it is not smuggling weapons for ISIL.
So the only
way that Iraq is going to rid itself of this ISIL threat is by conducting
military operations against all ISIL controlled areas. This allows them to kill
any ISIL fighters in that area, check those fighters are not hiding amongst the
civilian population and search entire city blocks for weapons caches.
Unless
Iraq does that then it is condemning itself to terrorist violence almost
indefinitely. Or at least until the security situation gets so bad that they’re
prepared to accept a Saddam-style Sunni dictator. For the sake of arguments at
this point let’s call him; “Recep.”
The US’ only concern at this point is to
secure a big flag, chest beating victory of Mosul in the days just before the
November 8th (8/11/16) Presidential election in order to sweep
Hillary Clinton to power.
The US seems extremely confident of succeeding in this
timetable. The persistent rumour is that through Erdogan the US has brokered a
deal with ISIL.
Although ISIL will leave a few fighters in Mosul to make it
look convincing the US will grant the bulk of ISIL’s fighters safe passage from
Mosul to Raqqa in Syria. This deal already seems to be in effect.
Crucially in perpetration
for the Mosul operation the US has declined to liberate the town of Tal Afar
from ISIL. This sits on the main Highway 47 linking Mosul with Syria.
On Friday
(14/10/16) a convoy of ISIL vehicles arrived unmolested in Raqqa from Mosul.
This was made up of 10 coaches/buses each carrying around 80 people each alongside
35 pick-up trucks each carrying around 10 people each.
Assuming those vehicles
were all fully loaded we’re talking about 1,200 ISIL fighters being given safe
passage from Mosul. That is around one quarter of the 4,500 fighters that ISIL
were estimated to have in Mosul at the start of last week.
On an almost daily
basis there are reports of similar convoys containing wounded ISIL fighters
leaving Mosul for Raqqa along Highway 47. There have been no reports of these
convoys being attacked let alone destroyed by US airstrikes.
In conventional
warfare between nations this type of negotiated retreat has some value.
For
example in the 1982 Falklands war the UK forced Argentinean troops out of the
islands they refer to as the Malvinas. However they did not then go on to
invade Argentina. Instead the nations went on to restore normal if bad tempered
diplomatic relations.
Likewise in 1991 Gulf War once the coalition which
incidentally included Syria had forced Saddam’s troops from Kuwait they did not
then go on to invade Iraq.
However ISIL are not a nation state. They are a
terrorist group and one that most certainly does not adhere to accepted
diplomatic norms. As such there will be no negotiated solution with them. This
will only end when they are all either dead or in jail.
Staging this final battle in
Raqqa is a particularly bad idea at the moment. That is because the August 25th
(25/8/16) Turkish invasion of Syria has still not been resolved. In fact it has
been allowed to get worse.
Today it is being reported that Turkish backed forces
have liberated the town of Dabiq in Syria from ISIL. As always from reporters
based in Turkey this is not exactly the truth.
Although they are backed by
regular Turkish forces there are two main groups that have taken control of Dabiq.
The first of these is the Sultan Murad division of the United Turkmen Army (UTA). They are part of
the paramilitary wing of the Turkish Nationalist Movement Party (MHP).
The
second group is the Islamic Movement of the Freemen of the Levant/Harrakat Ahrar
ash-Sham al-Islamiyya (Ahrar al-Sham).
Alongside the Al Qaeda affiliate Al
Nusra Front both the UTA and Ahrar al-Sham fight as part of the Army of Conquest/Jaish al-Fatah
(JAF) coalition of Islamist terrorists.
Long term allies ISIL and the Army of
Conquest have an extensive history of rotating control of areas between themselves
as the political need dictates.
Most notably in August 2015 when Erdogan
instructed the Army of Conquest to hand control of the Marea (8km/5miles
north-west of Dabiq) to ISIL to provide an excuse for Turkey to launch the
invasion we’re now seeing. When that initial invasion was shelved in December
2015 Erdogan simply instructed the Army of Conquest to return control of Marea
back to ISIL.
When the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF/QSD) crossed the Euphrates
River in May 2016 Erdogan instructed ISIL to cede control of the border town of
Cobanbey (50km/30miles) west of the Euphrates to the Army of Conquest. When it
became clear that the Army of Conquest wouldn’t be receiving US backing to then
attack the SDF Erdogan simply ordered the Army of Conquest to return Cobanbey
back to ISIL control.
Although of extremely limited strategic importance the
town of Dabiq is of huge symbolic significance.
Located 30km (20 miles) north
of Aleppo City and 20km (10 miles) south of Syria’s border with Turkey it was
scene of a key battle in the 1515-1516 war between the Ottoman and Mamluk
Empires. The defeat of the Mamluks at Dabiq in August 1516 led to the collapse
of their Empire and the establishment of the Ottoman Empire across the
Middle-East, North Africa (MENA) region.
The fact that ISIL identify Dabiq as
the scene of the vital battle between the Islamic Caliphate and the Infidel’s
should tell you all you need to know about the extremely close alliance between
ISIL and Erdogan’s Turkey.
Turkey’s reason for invading Syria on August 25th
(25/8/16) was to stop the SDF cutting ISIL’s supply lines between Turkey and
their de facto Syrian capital of Raqqa.
With this supply route still open by
granting ISIL fighters safe passage from Mosul to Raqqa the US is effectively
also granted them safe passage via Turkey into either Europe or north African nations
such as Tunisia, Libya and Egypt.
During the recent celebrations of their 241st
Birthday the US Navy seemed very keen to remind everybody of their role in the
1801-1805 Barbary War. This was fought in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast
of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. At the time those so-called Barbary Nations were
part of the Ottoman Empire – the last Islamist Caliphate.
The US granting ISIL
fighters safe passage from Mosul to Raqqa whilst the Turkish occupation of
northern Syria continues also presents another problem. It won’t be long until
Erdogan starts putting pressure on the US to allow Turkey to mount an operation
to switch control of Raqqa from ISIL to the Army of Conquest.
If the last six
years have taught us anything the moment Erdogan exerts any form of pressure on
Obama then Obama will cave and let Erdogan do whatever the hell he likes.
So we
seem to be on the verge of Turkey annexing the entire north-east of Syria from
Azaz/Kilis all the way down the Euphrates River basin. That is alongside Turkey
annexing the entire north-west of Iraq across the Nineveh plains between Mosul
and the border with Syria.
For the past year Turkey has been conducting
airstrikes against the Kurdistan region of northern Iraq between Mosul and the
border with Iran. Surely it won’t be long before Erdogan starts using the
threat of Kurdish terrorism to also annex that region as he attempts to
re-establish the Ottoman Empire.
This is all alarmingly reminiscent of Nazi Germany’s
annexation of the Sudetenland in 1938. That was the event that tore apart the
League of Nations leading to both the Second World War and then the Cold War.
So due
to Obama’s efforts to have Hillary Clinton appointed President at any cost I suspect that
whomever wins in November may well refuse to take up the job.
17:30 on 16/10/16 (UK date).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
nike air max
air max 270
kevin durant shoes
golden goose outlet
adidas yeezy
converse outlet store
yeezy
golden goose sneakers
nike sneakers for men
hermes online
n6i78d6c84 o4m83x8g24 d8y02j4d28 j8z87b2r07 r3c23d9p32 o9d15u1d74
Post a Comment