Constitutional Clarification.

The United Kingdom has both a Monarch and a democratically elected government. This makes the answer to the question of who runs the country a fluid and difficult one. Strictly speaking it is the Monarch however every year in recent history the Monarch signs over authority for the day to day running of the country to the democratically elected Prime Minister. This means that pretty much every decision made in Britain between 1997 and 2008 was led by the New Labour party led by Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Peter Mandelson and a succession of Home Secretaries. Obviously during this time the Queen took an overview of events but had no active involvement in the decision making process because she also had to maintain an overview of Australia, Canada and the rest of the Commonwealth. Therefore the Bristol Abuse Case was totally the brainchild of the New Labour government specifically a cabal of female civil servants, MI5 officers and media figures who self-identify as homosexual.

Then in 2008 the credit crunch happened and the Queen lost an estimated £15million from her own personal fortune. This caused the Crown to take a much closer interest in the way Gordon Brown was running the country as evidenced by the Crown's refusal to include plans for a national identity database in the Queen's Speech. From that point the economic and national security situations in the UK were seen to deteriorate dramatically. Matters came to a head just before the G20 Summit while the Prime Minister was touring the Americas and the quarterly inflation figures were released showing that Britain was facing the twin devils of economic recession and inflation. This caused the Crown to take full control of British economic policy as will be evidenced by Wednesday's budget speech. At around the same time the Crown also took full control of Britain's national security as evidenced by the North-West anti-terrorism operation and the Nottingham power station arrests which both have Prince Phillip's dirty little finger prints all over them. In doing this the Crown also took full ownership of the Bristol Abuse Case.

This was a mistake so terrible that I think the Queen should identify the person who advised her to do so, take them outside and have them shot. You see now the Queen has full ownership of the Bristol Abuse Case then if it continues I will have little option but to question if she can still be considered a legitimate Monarch. What I cannot comment on is whether or not the Queen interpreted the death of David Cameron's son as an act of anointment.