Yesterday's Details

I'm sorry but they were so insignificant that I processed them, dealt with them and forgot about them. Unfortunately I forgot to tell anyone else about them. So here's what happened;

Because he thinks he's politically well connected within the confines of the small, parochial back water of Croydon this solicitor advised my grandmother as the donor to contest this case on the grounds that she's "happy with the result." He thinks that this will be enough to stop the process which under normal circumstances it may well be. However if it can be demonstrated that the donor does not understand the process (which in this case it can) or that there is reasonable suspicion of improper practice (which in this case there is) then the judge is under an obligation to use their discretion to best protect the donor's interests by ignoring them.

So this morning (Thursday) I was in an almost identical position to the one I was in on Tuesday night. The only difference is that now I've got a slightly stronger case that will take longer to come to a conclusion. Therefore I refer you to my earlier statement;

There are only two ways that the Brits will get away with this. Either they will intimidate me into backing down or they will sacrifice a bent judge and give me grounds to appeal.

You could tell just how screwed they are by the speed at which they brought out the verdict in the Peter Harvey case who is a shaky lookalike for this solicitor. In fact it's got so bad from them that my father has been ordered to "seek a compromise to prevent this from going to court." Personally I can see no need for a compromise. All that needs to happen is that the guilty need to punished and their assets signed over to the innocent as compensation.