Britain's Brexit Withdrawal Agreement: Moving Forward Pt.3

A direct continuation of Part Two; https://watchitdie.blogspot.com/2019/01/britains-brexit-withdrawal-agreement_47.html

In that post I looked at how from the EU and the British government's side the Brexit negotiations have been smooth, easy and highly organised.

What is making things seem so complicated are the actions of British Remoaners.

These Remoaners are engaged in a campaign to block Brexit.

Their main tactic has been to make the Brexit process as difficult as possible. In the hope that people will simply give up.

I went on to look at why this type of Remoaner is massively over represented within the British Parliament.

British Parliamentarians are absolutely terrified of power being restored to the British Parliament. It means they will actually have to do a day's work. Rather than claiming credit for laws passed by the EU.

I also looked at why, having being completely out manoeuvred by Prime Minister May, the SNP find themselves in an impossible position.

Of having to stop Brexit. Or admit to voters that the SNP's entire reason for being is a lie.

There is also another party in British politics absolutely committed to blocking Brexit. Sadly for reasons that are far more sinister. And nowhere near as sophisticated.

The Labour Party: At the June 8th 2017 (8/6/17) General Election the Labour Party were on course for an absolute disaster. Losing potentially up to 200 seats. Wiping them out as a British political party.

In the eyes of voters the Labour Party had become seen as so absolutely hopeless it started to swing back in their favour. They emerged as a potential protest vote.

A way for voters to ensure a Conservative government. But one chastened rather than arrogant with a majority of 200 to 300 seats.

As a result the Labour Party actually ended up gaining 30 seats. Leaving them 56 seats behind the Conservatives. And 60 seats short of a governing majority.

Unfortunately the Labour Party continue to be absolutely hopeless.

So they took finishing second, by a significant margin, to mean they were the most popular political party in all of Britain. And would soon be in power.

The Labour Party's official position is that in order to seize power they simply need to bring down the current government.

They believe that they will then be appointed as the government without the need for voters to be consulted in an election.

In order to achieve this the Labour Party would need to build a six party coalition. Something which has never been done before in British politics.

This unprecedented grand coalition would need to be made up of all of Britain's Parliamentary parties. Except for the Conservatives.

It would need to include the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). This is extremely unlikely.

The DUP and the Conservatives have long operated an electoral pact. The Conservatives don't contest seats where the DUP is standing and the DUP don't contest seats where the Conservatives are standing.

So the DUP may vote against the Conservatives on the Withdrawal Bill. They won't be joining a coalition government against the Conservatives.

If Labour do manage to assemble this elaborate coalition would still only have a majority of just 3 seats.

Significantly less than the 16 seat majority of the current Conservative government, backed by the DUP.

Either unaware or unfazed by the impossibility of the task the Labour Party have approached the Withdrawal Agreement in exactly the same way they have approached every political issue in Britain since the June 2017 General Election.

An opportunity to bring down the government and seize power.

A prime example of the Labour Party's lust for power at any cost was the June 14th 2017 (14/6/17) Grenfell Tower fire.

Let's pretend for a moment the Grenfell Tower fire didn't occur amid a spate of Islamist terror attacks against Britain.

Islamist terror attacks specifically designed to aid the Labour Party. In order to weaken Britain's position during Brexit.

Let us also pretend for a moment that the Grenfell Tower fire didn't start in the apartment of a man who attended the Al Maneer Mosque. Let us also pretend for a moment that the Al Maneer Mosque hasn't produced no fewer than 19 Islamist terrorists.

Those 19 include multiple members of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). Including Choukri Ellekhlifi, Alexanda Kotey and Aine Davis.

Three of the so-called; "Beatles." Who, led by Mohammed - "Jihadi John" - Emwazi were specifically tasked with murdering western hostages.

Let's also pretend for a moment that the Kensington & Chelsea Parliamentary seat in which Grenfell Tower stands hadn't just been won, for Labour by Emma Dent Coad. By a margin of just 20 votes.

A margin so narrow it would normally trigger an automatic investigation into electoral fraud.

Let us also pretend the Grenfell Tower fire didn't prevent the automatic investigation into Emma Dent Coad's election. Despite 14 people having since being convicted for lying about living in Grenfell Tower. And therefore their right to vote for Emma Dent Coad.

Let's also pretend that the Labour Party didn't extensively use fire as a weapon during the August 2011 riots. Particularly in the Croydon Central constituency.

Let us also pretend that use of fire didn't lead to a massive expansion of rented, social housing in the Croydon Central Constituency. Demographic change which allowed Labour to finally win the seat at the 2017 General Election.

Unseating Gavin Barwell. Who is now Prime Minister May's Chief-of-Staff. Tasked with getting the Withdrawal Agreement through Parliament.

Let us also pretend for a moment that within London fire safety is exclusively the responsibility of the Mayor. That would be Mayor Sadiq Khan of the Labour Party.

Let's also pretend for a moment that Emma Dent Coad's previous job wasn't sitting on the Mayor's Fire and Emergency Planning Authority.

Finally let us pretend for a moment that under the Labour Mayor London Fire Brigade flatly refused to investigate the cause of the Grenfell Tower fire for a full 18 months.

Even if you can pretend all those things did not happen the Labour Party still treated the Grenfell Tower as nothing more than an opportunity to bring down the government and seize power.

As with the Withdrawal Agreement the Labour Party's main approach to the Grenfell Tower fire was to spread transparent lies.

For example the Labour Party have, and continue to claim that cladding was fitted to Grenfell Tower for purely cosmetic reasons.

In fact the cladding was fitted as part of an insulation system to reduce heat loss and allow Britain to meet its greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions targets.

Emissions targets the Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair signed Britain up to in 2007. Apparently by mistake.

Probably the most pernicious lie the Labour Party told about Grenfell Tower was that hundreds had been killed in the fire. Only a Defence of the Realm Notice (D-Notice) had been issued by Prime Minister May to keep it a secret.

The issuing of D-Notice's are not made public. However to be effective they have to be sent to every media outlet in the country. They are actually issued on a formal register which all news outlets have access to.

So people, particularly the people I associate with, know the moment a D-Notice has been issued. And why it has been issued.

No D-Notice was issued, nor has ever been issued in relation to any aspect of the Grenfell Tower fire.

Fuelled by the lies the Labour Party then moved into open violence and intimidation.

On June 17th (17/6/17) the Labour Party organised a local; "Day of Rage" protest within Kensington & Chelsea.

As was the plan this rapidly turned into a riot.

With the local Town Hall being attacked causing hundreds of thousands of pounds of damage. And Conservative members of the local council being physically assaulted.

Although it flopped badly the Labour Party also tried to organise a national; "Day of Rage" protest on June 20th (20/6/17). Targeting the State Opening of Parliament that day.

In her speech to Parliament during the State Opening the Queen wore a hat bearing the; "Starry Plough" insignia. A powerful symbol amongst Irish Republicans.

Particularly for the Irish National Liberation Army (INLA). The same INLA which assassinated British MP Airey Neave within the Parliament building in March 1979.

The newly minted Duchess of Sussex has since been dispatched to work closely with the Al Maneer Mosque. So now we all know about its links to Islamist terrorism. 

The Labour Party's strategy towards the Withdrawal Agreement is simply to reject it. Without even reading it.

Their hope is that the failure of the Withdrawal Agreement to be passed by Parliament will be enough to justify a No Confidence vote in the government. Which Labour hope will bring down the government and put them in power.

Labour are assuming people are all too thick  to notice that Prime Minister May has efficiently negotiated an extremely strong Withdrawal Agreement with the EU.

It's just that Prime Minister May has a very narrow Parliamentary majority. And the Labour Party will vote against whatever she does.

Following the Christmas recess Labour seem to have backed off from their demand that they simply be appointed as the next government. Without the need for voters to be consulted in a General Election.

Sadly this doesn't seem to be because Labour have finally figured out that in order to secure a majority of just three they need to pull off the impossible task of forming a six party coalition.

Instead the change seems to be the result of the Labour Party realising that the public simply won't stand for them being appointed as the government. Rather like some sort of Communist dictatorship.

So, in public at least Labour are now calling for a General Election.

The 2017 General Election campaign was one of the shortest in history. Starting on April 18th (18/4/17) it lasted for 51 days.

On January 9th (9/1/19) the Withdrawal Agreement bill was controversially, and probably illegally amended.

To give the government three days to advise Parliament of the next steps. In the event of the bill being defeated.

Those three days expire on Monday, January 21st (21/1/19).

So the earliest a No Confidence motion can be tabled is Tuesday, January 22nd (22/1/19).

The government then has 14 working days to respond. Meaning the earliest a No Confidence vote can take place is Monday, February 11th (11/2/19).

Assuming the campaign can be as brief as the 2017 campaign the earliest date for a General Election is Thursday, April 4th (4/4/19).

Five days AFTER Britain leaves the EU.

The results of the 2017 General Election weren't actually known until June 26th (26/6/17). 18 days after the vote was held.

So Labour's plan is not just for Britain to crash out of the EU on March 29th (29/3/19) with No Deal.

It's for Britain to crash out with No Deal and no government.

As I've said the effects of Britain leaving the EU with No Deal will be absolutely catastrophic.

It is the equivalent of Britain placing itself under a complete economic blockade.

This is so serious that it constitutes a Defence of the Realm issue. Rather than a party political issue.

As such, during the debate British Parliamentarians have been provided with numerous reminders of the consequences of their actions.

Starting on December 19th (19/12/18) Gatwick Airport, Britain's second largest, was closed for 36 hours. Due to the presence of drones.

This short period of disruption saw more than 1,000 flights cancelled and the travel plans of hundreds of thousands of passengers disrupted.

No sooner had Gatwick Airport re-opened then Birmingham Airport was forced to close. On December 23rd (23/12/18).

Again cancelling hundreds of flights and disrupting the travel plans of thousands of passengers. This shutdown was blamed on a communications failure.

The Parliamentary debate on the Withdrawal Agreement formally resumed on January 8th (8/1/19). Following the Christmas recess.

This was marked by Heathrow Airport, Britain's largest being closed for several hours. As the result of renewed drone activity.

This severe disruption gave Parliamentarians a small taste of the chaos they are proposing by rejecting the Withdrawal Agreement.

They are not talking about shutting down a few of Britain's airports for a few hours. They're proposing shutting down all of Britain's airports indefinitely.

On December 21st (21/12/18) the Grande Tema (Great Theme) cargo shipped was hijacked by Nigerian pirates. In the Thames Estuary of all places.

On December 22nd (22/12/18) it was raided by British Special Operations Forces (SOF's). The four hijackers were detained for immigration offences.

This cargo ship hijacking further highlighted to British Parliamentarians the chaos they are proposing by rejecting the Withdrawal Agreement.

They are not just proposing shutting down all of Britain's airports indefinitely. They are also proposing shutting down all of Britain's seaports indefinitely.

Cargo ships are truly the lifeblood of the global economy.

The fact the hijackers were Nigerian and charged with immigration offences highlights what Britain stands to gain from leaving the EU.

Finally being able to restrict the number of EU migrants Britain will be able to be more welcoming to migrants from Commonwealth nations such as Nigeria.

Rather than hijacking a ship those four men could simply apply for a visa in Nigeria.

The involvement of SOF's goes into a not particularly relevant tangent of military matters.

For the past four years I've been heavily involved in the war in Syria and Iraq. It should tell you how serious the prospect of a No Deal Brexit is that I've been pulled off the line there to deal with this.

British Parliamentarians are currently considered a greater threat to Britain than ISIL or Al Qaeda.

I may have received an anonymous phonecall telling me the new date for the Withdrawal Agreement vote. Before British Parliamentarians were told that the original vote was going to be cancelled.

British Parliamentarians continue to be upset about being shown their place in this world of ours.

However Iraq and Syria are far from the only nations former US President Barack Obama destroyed. He also destroyed Libya. Which in turn destroyed Mali. Which in turn destroyed Nigeria.

In counter-terrorism terms Nigeria is too big to fail. Even if US SOF's are understandably getting fed up of having to do all the work. There's simply not enough of them to repair all the damage Obama did.

On Thursday January 10th (10/1/19) the M6 Motorway had to be closed near Stoke-on-Trent. After 27 irregular migrants/asylum seekers leapt from a cargo truck onto the roadway.

Again this further highlights to British Parliamentarians the chaos they are proposing by rejecting the Withdrawal Agreement.

They are not just proposing shutting down all of Britain's airports indefinitely. They are also no just proposing shutting down all of Britain's seaports indefinitely.

British Parliamentarians are also proposing shutting down all road freight into, within and out of the UK. Indefinitely.

As a general rule; If you buy something in a shop then it got there on a truck.

The fact the story involved irregular migrants/asylum seekers also highlights something else Britain stands to gain from leaving the EU.

Being unable to impose restrictions on EU migrants Britain has been overwhelmed. This has left the British public very inhospitable to both Commonwealth migrants and genuine asylum seekers.

Something which has been made worse by the EU's policy of abusing the refugee system to allow in economic migrants.

Finally being able to restrict the number of EU migrants Britain will be able to be more welcoming to genuine refugees.

Also I think US National Security Adviser John Bolton really needs to explain why Iran is suddenly producing so many economic migrants.

Both the Grande Tema and the M6 stories also highlight that absolutely massive concession Prime Minister May was able to win from the EU in the Withdrawal Agreement.

Northern Ireland will be able to stay in a single market with the EU. While at the same time being able to do away with the Free Movement of People/Human Capital.

The tactics being used by Remoaners and particularly the Labour Party closely resemble terrorism.

Specifically the tactics used by the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) during The Troubles in Northern Ireland.

In the 1980's and 1990's PIRA conducted a series of bombing campaigns on the British mainland. Unlike in Northern Ireland the purpose of these bombings was not to kill. Instead the purpose to was to damage and disrupt the British economy.

Take for example this footage of the June 15th 1996 (15/6/96) PIRA bombing of Manchester; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUl2ye6sPG8

It starts with the police cordoning off and evacuating the area around where the bomb was planted. It then shows attempts to defuse the bomb. Finally it shows police helicopter footage focused on the bomb as it explodes.

The reason the police were able to do this wasn't due to some amazing counter-terrorism operation against PIRA.

It's because PIRA phoned them up. Not only to tell them where the bomb had been placed but exactly when it was going to detonate.

PIRA even left the hazard lights on the vehicle on. Making it impossible for the police to miss.

The goal for PIRA was the immense economic damage the massive bomb did to Manchester's physical infrastructure.

The 1996 PIRA bombing of Manchester was part of a wider campaign that also targeted the cities of London and Warrington.

Collectively they caused the bankruptcy of the Lloyd's of London insurance group. A jewel in the crown of Britain's City of London financial sector.

When anti-terrorism laws were overhauled following 9/11 the specific offence of Economic Terrorism was created. Specifically to outlaw this type of tactic.

The damage to the British economy caused by a No Deal Brexit far outstrips that of any PIRA bombing campaign.

It is this damage that the Remoaners and the Labour Party are threatening to do unless we give in and give them what they want.

As such the Remoaners and the Labour Party could well find themselves classed as terrorists.

I'm sure authorities in Gibraltar can remind them of what that entails.

Certainly over the Christmas recess, particularly the Labour Party have been reminded of their past crimes. Crimes for which they are completely reliant on Britain to continue to provide protection for them. To help them avoid prosecution.

For example on New Years Eve (31/12/18) there was a massive warehouse fire in the Croydon North Constituency.

Labour used the massive fires of the August 2011 riots to springboard from Croydon North into Croydon Central. Having failed by legal means to do so at every election since 1997.

The Croydon warehouse fire was quickly outshone by an Islamist knife attack at Manchester's Victoria Railway Station.

This served as a reminder of the alliance between Islamist terrorist groups and the Labour Party. Particularly the May 22nd 2017 (22/5/17) bombing of the Manchester Evening News Arena (MENA).

The fact it was a knife attack also referenced the June 3rd 2017 (3/6/17) London Bridge terror attack. Along with what a mess Labour Mayor Sadiq Khan is making of London.

During the London Bridge terror attack there was actually another mass stabbing in the Vauxhall area of London.

It took people a while to work out this wasn't part of the terror attack. It was just one of your typical, everyday knife attacks in London.

The Labour Party's position is that as soon as they seize power they will be able to negotiate a much better deal with the EU.

The noises coming out of the EU over the Christmas recess very much contradict Labour's claim. 

The general position is that whomever is in charge if Britain rejects this current Withdrawal Agreement the EU will scrap it. Britain will never again be offered a deal this good.

There is particular hostility towards the Labour Party. They are seen as falling very far short of the standards of a government the EU would be able to have any dealings with.

The criticism of the Labour Party by Poland is particularly worth bearing in mind.

As I've said Britain has never been anyone's favourite member of the EU. It's more a case of Britain being tolerated because of the money it brings.

The EU budget is a very complicated business. However you could almost get away with saying that Britain's contribution to the EU budget goes directly to Poland. Making Poland the closest thing Britain has to an ally in the EU.

On January 4th (4/1/19) five teenage girls were killed in a fire in an Escape Room in Koszalin in Poland.

Exactly like the Grenfell Tower fire it was initially blamed on an electrical fault. It then rapidly emerged that this was a lie. The fire was not caused by an electrical fault.

A man has since been arrested for causing the danger of the fire.

On Friday January 11th (11/1/19) the UK Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox expressed disbelief at Poland's position. Through the air pollution death of Ella Kissi-Debrah.

So on Sunday January 13th (13/1/19) Poland re-stated its position. With the stabbing of Gdansk Mayor Pawel Adamowicz.

Given the current murder rate it seems Labour Mayor Sadiq Khan is the only person in London who hasn't been stabbed.

Gdansk is a massively important place in the history of the Trade Union movement. It is the birthplace of the Solidarity Trade Union. Founded by Lech Walesa, the second President of Poland and still a massive national hero in the country.

On Monday January 14th (14/1/19) it was announced that the UK Attorney General has dropped his opposition to the Withdrawal Agreement. And that Pawel Adamowicz has died.

So I think its fair to assume that under a Labour government Britain would be dead to the EU.

Once the Withdrawal Agreement has been adopted by Parliament it should be obvious to the Labour Party that they can no longer block it as a way to bring down the government.

But then simple maths should have already made it obvious to the Labour Party that in this Parliament there is no way for them to become the next government.

Much like simple maths should have already made it obvious to the Labour Party that there is no time for either a General Election or a second referendum before Britain leaves the EU.


(Originally posted at 17:20 on 14/1/19 (UK date)).

18:20 on 15/1/19 (UK date).