Hillary
Clinton's campaign has been more than happy to engage in the political violence
of the current Democratic administration.
Throughout the
early part of 2016 up to the conventions this electoral campaign has been
marked by often quite serious violence at and around rallies by the Republican
nominee Donald Trump. That violence has been carried out by supporters of
Hillary Clinton and organised by the Democrat Party.
One of the most
well documented examples of this is Zumela Rodriguez who led the violence at
Trump's rally in Chicago in March 2016 which caused it to be cancelled. At the
time Rodriguez was on the payroll of the Hillary Clinton campaign being paid
around $1000 for her time. She was also paid a $30 dollar bonus which was put
down in the campaign accounts as a payment for a 'phone.'
Then of course
there is the Republican Party campaign office in Orange County, Hillsborough,
North Carolina. On October 15th (15/10/16) this was burnt out in a firebomb
attack and graffiti warning the; "Nazi Republicans" to leave the
area.
There are of
course many other examples because as Democrat campaign organiser James O'Keefe
is on the record as saying; "Sometimes we just pay insane people to do
things for us."
Although I would
say that it is not even the biggest the most talked about scandal of Hillary
Clinton's term as Secretary of State is her use of a private email server.
On July 5th
(5//7/16) a long FBI investigation found that through her use of
that server Hillary Clinton had leaked
110 secure government documents. Ten of those documents carried the most
serious "Top Secret" status. Each on of those documents represents a
separate criminal offence committed by Hillary Clinton against the United
States contrary to Title 18 Chapter 37 Section 793(f) of the US code -
sometimes referred to as the 1917 Espionage Act.
Under that act
the test of guilt is not intent but merely gross negligence. That means that
the person needs not have chosen to leak secret documents. They merely need to
have caused secret documents to be held insecurely through their own
carelessness.
The FBI described Hillary Clinton's behaviour as "extremely
careless" and Hillary Clinton herself admits that she made serious
mistakes. Those are just synonyms for; "Gross Negligence."
However Hillary
Clinton has still not been prosecuted for those crimes. In explaining his
decision not to prosecute FBI director James Comey said that he simply did not
want to. That is most certainly not a valid legal reason.
We are assured
though that the failure to prosecute Hillary Clinton has absolutely nothing to
do with the cozy chat that her husband Bill Clinton had with Attorney General
Loretta Lynch aboard his private jet just days before. We are also assured that
it has absolutely nothing to do with the $500,000 that Hillary Clinton's close
friend Terry McAuliffe donated to the wife of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe
who was the lead agent in the investigation.
If you are
interested in justice or democracy the most worrying element of Hillary
Clinton's campaign was the way they immediately used violence in an attempt to
intimidate law enforcement.
This began on
the day the FBI announced the findings of its investigation - (5/7/16) - with
the release of a video showing the death of a black man - Alton Sterling - in
Baton Rogue, Louisiana at the hands of the police.
At the time of
his death Sterling was in possession of a illegal firearm with which he'd been
threatening members of the public and physically attacking the police officers
who'd been called in to protect the public from Sterling. As such you will
struggle to find a better example of the legal use of lethal force.
The following
day (6/7/16) another video was released of another black man - Philando Castile
- being shot and killed at the hands of the police. This time in St Paul,
Minnesota.
At the time
Castile was legally in possession of a concealed firearm but refused to follow
the training which allowed him to carry that weapon. Instead he refused to
follow the police officers instructions to show his hands while shouting that
he had a gun and reaching for it. Castile's death was not caused so much by the
bullet wound to his arm but by the fact his girlfriend - Diamond Reynolds -
blocked the police officers attempts to render lifesaving medical aid so she
could film Castile's death in the style of an ISIL Martyrdom video.
Although both of
these shootings were legally justified the Democrat thugs of the Black Lives
Matter (BLM) movement immediately took to the streets of cities across the US
in protest and riot. They even stormed the official residence of the Minnesota
Governor.
On Thursday
(7/7/16) FBI Director Comey was called before the US Congress to answer
questions on the Hillary Clinton investigation. The Democrat members of
Congress universally used this not to discuss Hillary Clinton's crimes but as
an opportunity to incite their BLM street army into a further frenzy of anger
and violence.
That very night
the violence that the Democrats had incited boiled over. At a BLM protest in
Dallas, Texas one of the protesters picked up a rifle and opened fire on the
police killing five officers and wounding seven others.
Despite this
attack the Democrats still failed to condemn BLM as the domestic terror group
that they are. Instead the Democrats continued to incite BLM further in the
hope law enforcement would be intimidated and back off from prosecuting Hillary
Clinton.
Again the
violence the Democrats had incited in order to keep Hillary Clinton in the
Presidential race boiled over into another BLM terror attack. This time in Baton
Rouge, Louisiana where three more police officers were shot and murdered.
That a candidate
for a major US political party would use violence and terror against not just
political opponents but against the apparatus of state such as the justice
system is absolutely shocking. Rather than being something you associate with a
prosperous democracy it is something you more normally find in third world
dictatorships and failed states.
Although it
pre-dates Obama's candidacy let alone his Presidency the recent case study that
continues to influence international thinking on such matters is Kenya in
2007/8.
Here both
candidates for the Presidency sent armies of thugs to the streets to prevent
people from voting for their opponent. When the election result was announced
both candidates rejected it and their respective street armies intensified
their violence. It was only after 1,500 people had been killed and 600,000
internally displaced and the United Nations (UN) intervened that a Government
of National Unity (GNU) was formed the violence ended
Other good
current examples are Libya where they now have a Government of National Accord
(GNA) and South Sudan which is still under discussion. In both these cases the
US State Department and the US Ambassador to the UN frequently make statements
calling on all parties to refrain from violence and respect the democratic process.
The Democrats
approach to democracy also seems rather similar to the current situation in
Venezuela.
Amid an economic
collapse the Venezuelan people are desperate to hold a recall election to get
rid of their President Nicholas Maduro. However being under the political
control of Maduro the nation's Courts keep trying to block them.
For example the
rules state that for a recall election to take place a petition must be signed
by 1% of voters nationally. With more than 10% of voters having signed the petition
the Courts have suddenly and inexplicably decided that it must be 1% of voters
in each electoral district. The Supreme Court is refusing to rule on the issue
until 2017 by which time a recall election will only result in Maduro being
replaced by his deputy - Aristobulo Isturiz - rather than a new President being
elected.
With Maduro's
predecessor Hugo Chavez tending to blame everything on the American capitalist
pig dogs the US has tried to avoid commenting on the situation too much.
However apparently food shortages in the country have got so bad that earlier this year the
Obama administration was forced to grant US citizenship to Alicia Machado.
The Democrats
repeated assaults on democracy and the rule of law over these past years have
been loudly protested by America's peers in Europe and as far a field as
Australia and Brazil. The assumption amongst developed democracies being that
any party prepared to behave in such a way would simply be banned from
participating in the democratic process.
Then of course
there is the ever present question of Hillary Clinton's health and her medical
fitness to hold the office of President.
According to her
medical records since 2012 Hillary Clinton has been taking a drug called
Warfarin to thin her blood and stop it from clotting. Officially the reason for
this is to prevent a condition called Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT).
Normally when a
patient is prescribed Warfarin to guard against DVT they are immobilised such
as if they were bedridden after major surgery or in traction to treat a
fracture. Clearly neither of these circumstances apply to Hillary Clinton.
Therefore it is highly unusual that she is still taking Warfarin some four years
later.
Hillary
Clinton's treatment is much more consistent with what you would expect of a
patient who is at high risk of suffering from Ischemic Attacks. Sometimes
referred to as "Strokes" these attacks which can be transient in
nature - TIA's - occur when the blood vessels in the brain get blocked by clots
causing the brain to shut down.
Depending on the severity of the attack this can cause the patient to
black out and fall alongside longer lasting effects such as paralysis and
death.
Hillary
Clinton's treatment with Warfarin of course began following a mysterious fall
back in 2012. That fall undeniably left Hillary Clinton with a degree of brain
damage. That is why following it she had to wear glasses with special Fresnel
lenses to correct her double vision.
Then of course
there was Hillary Clinton's mysterious fall at the 9/11 memorial on September
11th (11/9/16). There have also been numerous photographs and video footage of
Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail suffering from stumbles and dizzy spells
and then having members of her staff perform neurological tests on her hands
and face to rule out the paralysis normally associated with TIA's.
If, as the
evidence suggests, Hillary Clinton is suffering from TIA's that would
absolutely rule her medically unfit to become President. During TIA's the
braincells die and are not replaced leading to neurological impairment.
Normally the first thing to go is memory followed by cognitive or reasoning
skills.
Throughout the
investigation into her emails Hillary Clinton has made no secret of the fact
that she suffers from memory loss. Lately she has also been showing signs of
impaired reasoning.
On September
17th (17/9/16) a terrorist bombing
occurred in the Chelsea district of New York City. Hillary Clinton's first
reaction was to attempt to deny that it had been a terrorist attack. She even
went so far as to condemn Donald Trump for declaring that the bombing had in
fact been caused by a bomb.
Obviously having
showed that her heart lies with radical Islamist terrorist who wish to attack
US citizens rather than those US citizens Hillary Clinton really needed a
distraction to move the newscycle on.
So on September
20th (20/9/16) we had yet another tale of an unarmed black man being murdered
by the racist police. This time Keith Scott in Charlotte, North Carolina. In
order to incite BLM to protest and dominate the newscycle the Democrat Mayor
Jennifer Roberts initially refused to release video of the shooting in the hope
of fuelling a conspiracy theory.
On September
23rd (23/9/16) Keith Scott's wife - Rakeyia Scott - released her own video of
the shooting.
Obviously Mrs
Scott knew that her husband was an extremely violent man who had served 6 years
in prison for shooting a man after taking a plea bargain on an attempted murder
charge. Mrs Scott herself has had to report her husband to the police on
several occasions in order to protect herself and their children. Mrs Scott
also knew that her husband was in possession of an illegal firearm rather than
a book as was initially claimed.
So Mrs Scott's
video features her shouting repeatedly - I think 9 times - and clearly
"Don't You Do it Keith!" as she herself was concerned her husband was
about to open fire on the police.
Bizarrely it was
at this moment that Hillary Clinton decided to travel to Charlotte, North
Carolina to meet with the family and support their campaign against the police.
As if standing alongside people who are so clearly lying would in some way help
her campaign.
It actually fell
to Mayor Roberts who is quite a low ranking member of the Democrat Party to
plead with Hillary Clinton to cancel her visit because it would damage her
campaign.
Then of course
there was the second Presidential debate. Asked a question about her email
scandal Hillary Clinton acknowledged that she had made a series of mistakes. In
doing so she acknowledged that she had committed the Gross Negligence element
of the offence in front TV cameras that were recording and roughly 80 million
witnesses. That alone should have been grounds to re-open the investigation.
This pattern of
seemingly irrational behaviour has very much been the hallmark of
Hillary Clinton's campaign.
For example just
last Wednesday (2/11/16) she invited Obama to campaign for her at North
Carolina University in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. This course was the scene
of the February 10th 2015 (10/2/15)
Chapel Hill shooting in which three Muslim students at North Carolina
University were murdered in their off campus home by a neighbour.
Immediately
following the shooting the local Mosque which at the time was under FBI
investigation for links to ISIL organised protests condemning America's
oppressive Islamaphobia. They were quickly joined by Turkish President/Prime
Minister/Emperor Recep Tayyip Erdogan who called on Obama to publicly condemn
the Islamaphobic murders.
Of course what
Obama should have done is taken the opportunity to gently remind Erdogan that
in a democracy it is not the place of the President to interfere in ongoing
criminal investigations. Instead Obama meekly did what Erdogan told him to and
condemned the Islamaphobic murders.
Obviously the
case still has to go to trial. However investigators have still not found any
evidence of an Islamaphobic motive. They have though found lots of evidence
that the killings were motivated by a parking dispute.
Why you would
want to remind voters of that right before an election is utterly beyond me.
Particularly as
most of the students Obama was campaigning in front of will not actually vote
in this key battleground state. Instead they will cast absentee ballots in
their home state.
If Hillary
Clinton has that sort of brain fade as President particularly if she's dealing
with a potential nuclear confrontation between Russia and Turkey in Syria or
the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK/North) the consequences would
be absolutely catastrophic.
As I'd hoped
Barack Obama would finally be learning it is not simply enough for CNN to
refuse to cover the story or try a put a positive spin on it for voters. If a
President suffers from even a temporary loss of logical reasoning it will
create very real problems to which very real solutions will need to be found.
A prime example
of this is the current situation in Syria.
On August 24th
(24/8/16) Turkey launched an invasion and occupation of northern Syria to
protect ISIL's supply-lines to and from Turkey from the Syrian Democratic
Forces (SDF). What Obama should have immediately done is to tell Erdogan in no
uncertain terms to withdraw his occupation force.
However Obama
chickened out of that thinking that he could distract voters with a big
operation to liberate Mosul in Iraq to which CNN would be given front row
seats. This plan of course relies on leaving the west of Mosul undefended to
allow ISIL to escape back to Raqqa in Syria.
Then at an apparently
very angry NATO meeting it was pointed out to the US that if ISIL fighters can
flee to Raqqa then they can flee to Europe and beyond via Turkey.
So suddenly
yesterday (6/11/16) it was announced that the SDF are launching an operation to
liberate Raqqa. This has me extremely concerned.
The combined
Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) and Iraqi Peshmerga forces bearing down on Mosul
massively outstrip the size of force ISIL have to defend the city. So despite
the fact that due to a complete lack of strategic planning they will suffer
unnecessarily high casualties Mosul will eventually by liberated.
The SDF however
are a much smaller, lightly armed almost guerrilla force. Therefore there is a
very real risk that the SDF will be wiped out in an operation to liberate
Raqqa. That means that there will no longer be a moderate anti-ISIL groundforce
in Syria.
So the US can
cut off my Internet connection and it can block my Tweets to stop me talking
about it. Hillary Clinton may even win the election.
However we're
still going to be left with the problem of how to defeat ISIL. No matter what name they're using this week.
The FBI
investigation into Hillary Clinton's espionage is also another prime example of
political spin not being the same as success.
Since July
Hillary Clinton, the Democrats and the media have been assuring us that the
investigation is closed and we should all just move on. Obviously I would like
to say that is simply not true.
However in the
time it has taken me to look up the specific statute on my phone and then get
this to an Internet cafe to publish it seems that Comey has made a decision.
In certain
sections of the media - particularly CNN - this is being reported as the FBI
finding no evidence that Hillary Clinton has committed any crime. However this
isn't quite true.
Under intense
pressure from the same Democrat Congressmen who riled up BLM Comey has decided
to refer everyone to his earlier statement of July 5th (5/7/16). As I'm sure
Comey is well aware this is something that suspects frequently do under
interrogation. Normally right before they invoke the fifth amendment against
self-incrimination.
Comey's original
statement of course is that there is clear evidence that Hillary Clinton has
committed 110 crimes of espionage against the US. However he just doesn't want
to prosecute her for those crimes.
So it seems that
once again the weight of the world is upon the shoulders of you, the American
voter.
As I see it your choice for
President is between;
A man who has
successfully run a multinational corporation for more than 30 years and is
probably the most liberal Republican candidate since the 1980's.
Or;
A woman who
appears to be at war with America and seems to view the Presidency as an
alternative to prison.
12:50 on 7/11/16 (UK date)
