Now Let This be my Final Statement.

Twitter; [ Quote ]1/2 As for the massive traffic jam on the UK's #M25 motorway I'll agree. Six days is an awful long time to wait for [ / quote ]

[ Quote ] 2/2 the Croydon 'Police' Borough Commander to sit the 'accusers' down and explain to them that they have no right to life. [ / quote]

[ Quote ] @KimKardashian  After all only dogs are allowed to give evidence in a Uk Court. [ / quote ]

[ Quote ] Seriously I think it's HRH's fault for allowing the local benefit bill to rise this high. [ / quote ]


Because if Sarastro is confused as to whether the above was a clear threat to kill all the witnesses involved in my case I'll be more than happy to print it out and then attach it to his forehead. With a nail gun.

After all I've heard he's not good at subtle 'hints.' I mean he's already brought himself a gold watch in order to fight off accusations that he is not welcome amongst London Metropolitan Polices' other 34,999 officers.

01:30 on 1/6/13.


Edited at around 03:30 on 1/6/13 to add;

The abortion that's over stayed it's welcome is; PC Mark 'Sarastro' Collins (P19180)

The first witness I'm not allowed to contact is Ms Elisa Thiel of 50 Beechwood Avenue, CR7-7DZ.

The second witness I'm not allowed to contact is Ms Jenny South of 53 Beechwood Avenue, CR7-7DZ.

However I should point out that I am not publishing this to encourage anyone to approach, threaten or in any other way harass the above. After all that is my job. In fact I only mention it so the Territorial Support Group (TSG) know the address they've got to rape their way through over the coming days.

The Georgia Williams Kidnapping.

On Wednesday (29/5/13) West Mercia Police made a public appeal to help find Georgia Williams a 17 year old girl who went missing from Shropshire, UK on Sunday (26/5/13). The police are particularly keen on tracking the movements of a Silver Toyota Haice 300 GS van registration CX06 ASV. They have already arrested a 22 year old man on suspicion of kidnap however being the police since I've commented on the case they have today re-arrested the man on suspicion of murder in the hope everyone will forget the kidnap angle.

With obvious apologies to Ms Williams friends and family I do not know if she ever even existed. However the crime appears to have been arranged in response to my arrest on Sunday. You see much like a gambler that never knows when to quit the UK is treating my arrest as that great orgasmic moment that will cancel out their last 12 years of failure. Therefore they are bluffing, bullsh*tting and lying in an effort to find out what the world knows about my arrest and trying to convince them that they have a hope in hell of convicting me. As such the Georgia Williams kidnapping has three main elements;

1. The registration of the Silver Toyota Haice van is remarkably similar to my paternal grandfather's war time naval service number that began CHX. It has been alleged that my paternal grandfather served as a bodyguard to UK Prince Phillip's common-law adoptive father Lord Mountbatten amongst other things in a long and murky career. He was of course also married to my paternal grandmother who it has been alleged was murdered by "persons unknown" in an effort to steal her property and assets. Therefore a reference to him - especially a coded one - opens a whole can of worms.

2. The fact that Ms Williams is being described as an intelligent, attractive woman with her whole life in front of her could be a reference to any number of women I've had intimate relations with. After all I rarely waste my time on trash. However it seems to be a specific reference to the woman I'm rumoured (no formal allegation was ever made) to have raped in I think 2007. This is a reminder to Croydon that they are free to bring that up if they wish but it will be a very rocky road that is unlikely to end well for them.

3. The kidnap/unlawful imprisonment allegation is a specific reference to my arrest. While it is not in dispute that the officers on scene had more than probable cause to arrest me and the custody Sargent had more than probable cause to authorise my detention (both under the 1984 Police and Criminal Evidence Act/PACE) there are those amongst us who can read who feel that the moment the Officer in Charge (OIC) had read the case file he should have realised there was less than 1% chance of securing a conviction. Therefore his decision to continue my imprisonment for the purposes of interview was unlawful. After being made aware of the police assessment of the circumstances on interview his decision to return me to my cell while deciding to charge or bail me was even less lawful. His decision to bail me with conditions just seems like a sectarian vendetta.

In honour of Wednesdays England V Republic of Ireland football game I was tempted to assign the OIC the codeword of either "Setanta" from Gaelic mythology or "Sarastro" the evil wizard from Mozart's Magic Flute opera. However on reflection "Bubba O'Reilly" seems appropriate. I'll leave you to speculate whether or not that is a reference to the film "Forrest Gump."


So yeah I've really run out of clever words by this point. However at the risk of sparking off some vicious office politics I should warn the 5 Mysterious Individuals behind the Georgia Williams kidnapping that Bubba doesn't seem particularly good at taking hints. I mean was he walked me back to my cell following interview every other officer - both police and custody - turned their backs on him.


21:40 on 30/5/13.

Edited at around 01:25 on 31/5/13 to add;

Yep I've upgraded "Bubba O'Reilly" to a "Sarastro."

There Is News: Some Good, Some Bad.

The bad news is that I was planning on going to the gym today but it appears that my antics over the weekend have if not re-fractured my finger have certainly set back its healing.

The good news is that apart from guaranteeing that if charged I would be held in police custody over the weekend (some 66 hours) until I'd be brought before a Magistrate and allowing the local networks plenty of time to dream up allegations of breaches of bail conditions part of the reason the date for me to surrender to bail was set for June 28th (28/6/13) was that the police checked and discovered the splint is scheduled to come off on June 21st (21/6/13). The idea being to prevent me standing up in Croydon Magistrates Court and the Magistrate, as part of their checks on the prisoners welfare, being forced to ask; "What happened to your finger?" and me responding; "I broke it it using reasonable force to eject a trespasser from my property." Under the terms of criminal law I am fully entitled to the plots of land and buildings contained within known as 51 and 51A Beechwood Avenue as "My property."

The even better news is that the finger in question was the same one that I used to grip onto a iron fence on Queen's Road, Brighton and watched the police baton bend as it repeatedly struck it in the run up to the Iraq war. Although it didn't break on that occasion it did go a bit wonky around the second synovial joint. Therefore if the distal phalanx also goes a bit wonky I will feel entitled to christen my left middle finger my 'Police Finger.'

Also in light of my weekend do I really need to explain the Twitter argument between Amanda Bynes and Rihanna?

Finally I'm declaring China to be the weekend's big winner with their story about the baby (#59) rescued from a toilet pipe. As I said in response to the Woolwich murder video elements within the UK are very keen to make it easier for violent and dangerous criminals to escape prosecution. Therefore I cannot expand too much on the Chinese baby story. However it includes very specific details about my time in police custody so serves as a Chinese way of telling the UK that they know exactly what is going on.

Therefore it looks as though the UK's June Presidency of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is going to be fun. It will be around this time next week I'll be contacting the officer in charge of my case to enquire if he's even worked out what the mythical and magical piece of evidence he will need to have even a fractional chance of securing a conviction is.

11:45 on 29/5/13.

The Full Sutton Prison Hostage Taking.

Today it has emerged that on Sunday (26/5/13) a prison officer was taken hostage and badly beaten by three inmates at the Full Sutton maximum security prison near York, UK. The timing of the four hour incident between roughly 16:00 (local) and 20:00 (local) coincides almost perfectly with the start of my police interview and the wait to see whether I would be charged or bailed. Therefore this whole thing seems to have been put on in order to increase the drama and confuse everyone. For example my police interview took the form of me being locked in a small room with three men making me the prison officer in this metaphor.

The news that the Full Sutton crime is now being investigated by the North-East Counter Terrorism Command (NECTC) is supposed to give the impression that the decision whether to bail or charge me was taken out of the hands of Croydon Borough police and handed to SO15 the Metropolitan Polices Anti-Terrorist Command that used to be known as Special Branch. I honestly cannot comment on how true this is but I'm pretty sure that the case has gone all the way up to at least MI5 by now. This puts an interesting slant on the announcement today by the UK Chancellor/Finance Minister George Osborne that the government will not ask the Ministry of Defence or the Home Office (MI5) to do anything that will undermine their ability to protect this country. However that is not really George Osborne's decision to make so expect at more of this sort of thing in the coming days.

As for the bail form I really can't publish it. However as I've mentioned is fails to include the name of my "Appropriate Adult" or an alleged offence. I suspect though that I was arrested under the 1984 Police And Criminal Evidence Act in order to allow for an investigation into an offence under the 1971 Criminal Damage Act. This is quite a broad act that lists a number of offences. The most serious of these with is being thrown around for maximum dramatic effect is the Section 1 offence of damaging property with intent to endanger life or recklessness as to whether life would be endangered. This carries the maximum sentence of life imprisonment. However the section 1 offence relates to things like arson and cutting the break cables on a persons car so it would be highly unusual for it to be used in relation to smashed windows.

15:05 on 29/5/13.

Well I Gets Me Out of the House I Suppose.

Last night someone smashed in the front windows a number 50 Beechwood Avenue. The police obviously assumed it was me meaning that I've spent to the last 16 or so hours in a police cell. I've since being bailed to return o June 28th (28/6/13) on the condition I do not commit the further criminal offence of intimidating any witnesses.

Obviously this is an ongoing legal process so I am limited by what I can say. However the fact that I have been bailed rather than charged for the offence of criminal damage suggests the case against me is not strong enough to secure a conviction. There is the small issue of the fact that the nurse at the police station declared me to be a vulnerable person by way of mental illness delaying me being interviewed and thus prolonging my detention. However the same nurse did not consider me vulnerable enough to warrant calling a doctor to give me appropriate treatment for my medical condition.

We'll see what happens on June 28th but hopefully Croydon police will respond in the same way they responded to all the burglaries and criminal damage at my home and my grandmothers home and take no further action.

18:25 on 26/5/13.

Edited at around 21:25 on 26/5/13 to add: I really shouldn't be talking about this but;

The death of Clifford Clark in Liverpool, UK after being mauled to death by a dangerous dog does seem like a UK enquiry as to who is aware of the manner of my arrest I suppose this morning. If anyone has heard about this I'm kind of hoping they would get in touch with me but my memory is that I stepped outside by back door and was confronted by three or possibly four police officers. I then reached inside my pocket for a cigarette lighter and suddenly found myself flung face first into the nearest available wall. If the welts from the control handcuffs are still there tomorrow I may post pictures. It was around this point I decided to stop struggling and start being cheeky. So I may have given my name on arrest as "Jermaine Jackson" and answered the custody Sergent's initial question; "Have you ever been arrested before?" with the phrase "No but for a custody sergeant you're really f*cking ugly" before proceeding to correct his spelling, punctuation and grammar. I believe I also requested a breath alcohol (breathalyser) test but was refused on the grounds I may break the machine.

So yeah I laugh because at this point the only other option really is bursting into tears.

Edited again at around 13:30 on 27/5/13 to add; My day off is not going well.

For example the two women who were arrested for the manslaughter of Clifford Clark have been released on police bail. I do not know if their bail is unconditional however the conditions imposed on my bail make this difficult for me to talk about. Therefore I should state that I'm saying this in an attempt to inform and through that reassure rather than to intimidate.

The two women who are accusing me are close friends. At least one of them is a member of an organisation that has been linked to high levels of crime in the vicinity of Beechwood Avenue which has been classified by the police as having a harassing effect on local residents. Another member of that organisation has been demonstrated to have made false and misleading statements in a Court of law. Therefore under normal circumstances the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) would take an allegation of this sort and place it straight in the bin on the grounds it lacks credibility. However the fact that the member of the organisation was not prosecuted for perjury by making false and misleading statements in a Court of law suggests that we are not dealing with normal circumstances.

Oh and if you're familiar with the UK film "Four Lions" the Boston Marathon bombing and the firebombing of a Mosque in Grimsby will make a lot more sense.

The Woolwich Murder.

The last time I checked the purpose of terrorism was to induce terror. Therefore I've always felt that terrorist attacks are generally best ignored wherever possible.

However as my father's always been the sort to scare easily when I woke up this morning he couldn't wait to tell me about how the fact that Ingrid Loyau-Kennett (from Cornwall) who confronted one of the alleged attackers of Fusilier Lee Rigby in the Woolwich district of London yesterday (22/5/13) was a cub scout leader reminded him of that time an Eden Strang walked into my local Saint Andrews Roman Catholic church with two swords and started hacking away at the congregation. As it was far too early for me to put up with him once again showing off the little bit of cheap tin the Scout association will give Ms Loyau-Kennett for her 'bravery' I quickly changed the subject to point out that the way the blue Vauxhall Tigra car had crashed in Woolwich reminded me of an incident during the Croydon branch of the August 2011 riots. Basically the police put a line of riot police across the junction between London Road and Station/Tamworth Road to contain the crowd on London Road. So members of the crowd simply hijacked a passing car and drove it at speed into the line of riot police who sensibly moved out of the way.

Also one of the alleged attackers has been identified as Michael Adebolajo a 28 year old UK national with Nigerian ancestry. The Nigerian connection is a clear reaction to the current state of emergency that has been declared across three states in north-eastern Nigeria in response to the threat by the Islamist Boko Haram terrorist group. The UK is absolutely livid about this. You see they'd been building up Boko Haram in order scare the Nigerian government into deploying troops to the conflict in Mali. Rather logically the Nigerian government have instead decided to solve the problem in their own country first.

On an entirely related note the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) which is the umbrella group for Islamists in Mali, Nigeria, Niger, Chad and other West African nations have claimed responsibility for two suicide bomb attacks today in Niger that killed 20 at an army barracks in Agadez and at the French owned Somair uranium mine near Arlit. The targetting of the uranium mine was clearly intended to strengthen support for MUJAO's cause by portraying the foreigners they're fighting in Mali as colonialists there to steal Africa's natural resources. The reality of the situation is much more complicated then that. However the main message of the co-ordinated twin attacks in a nation that had until now been untouched by the conflict in Mali that there is still a lot of fight left in the Malian Islamists.

16:50 on 23/5/13.

Operation Misery: Month 3, Week 2, Day 7.

On Friday (24/5/13) Rihanna's Diamond World Tour recommences in Rabat, Morocco. I have already extensively covered the political dimensions of this loss making concert in my post "Operation Misery: Week 3, Day 6 - The Morocco Concert" that can be read here; http://watchitdie.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/operation-misery-week-3-day-6-morocco.html

However in the latest development the US Attorney General Eric Holder has today officially confirmed that the US killed Anwar al-Awlaki - the 'totally convincing leader' of Al-Qaeda in the Arab Pennisula (AQAP) - and three other US Citizens including al-Awaki's son Abdulrahman along with Samir Kahn and Jude Mohammed in CIA drone strikes in Yemen. This is intended to stoke up anti-American feeling across the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region while confusing governments in all the bits of the map that aren't marked "USA" by bringing up the complex issue of Islamic terrorism in Yemen (one suggested solution to the Syria conflict is known as 'The Yemen Model') and creating speculation about whether Chris Brown will be joining Rihanna ever again. You will note though that as far as we know Chris Brown has still not been arrested, indicted and placed on strict bail conditions while awaiting trial for offences including the original 2009 assault on Rihanna and multiple breaches of probation conditions including fraud, bribing public officials and perverting the course of justice. This in itself is intended to increase anti-American sentiment across most of the rest of the map.

On Sunday (26/5/13) Rihanna is scheduled to perform in Bilbao, Spain. This concert marks the start of the European leg of the tour which save for a scheduled diversion in Istanbul, Turkey (30/5/13) - I hear Rihanna's feeling a little 'throaty' - will stretch across 36 concerts before ending in Helsinki, Finland on July 28th (28/7/13). Unlike the US/Canada leg of the tour the European leg only really has one political objective - to allow the UK to reintegrate itself into the European Union (EU) or at least allow the US to gain a clear indication of where the UK has strong allegiances and where the UK has weak allegiances within the EU. So if you were medically minded and feeling a little bit lippy you could describe Rihanna's function as that of a barium enema.

The original plan was that during the US/Canada leg of the tour the disruption Rihanna caused through her antics - especially on the Asian/Australasian financial markets and the MENA region would leave European governments so baffled, confused and angry that they would be provoked into jealously lashing out against Rihanna. This could take the form of big, overt things like delaying the tour caravan at international border posts or arresting members of the core tour party for drugs offences. However the hope was that it would take the form of more low-key, discreet attacks like rider requests not being fulfilled, noisy neighbours in hotels and tensions between members of the core tour party being exacerbated in order to disrupt concert preparations in order to ensure reputation damaging poor performances. Obviously in order to retaliate against Rihanna in this discreet, behind the scenes way the host governments would need to know all the juicy backstage gossip.

To this end Rihanna's CIA handlers have made it abundantly clear that it has given all the necessary information to the UK. This included making sure that Rihanna was seen to be spending a lot of time with Cara 'Property of MI6' Delevinge and the launch of the summer collection that Rihanna has licensed UK High Street retailer River Island to use her name in an attempt to sell. The grubby little video that River Island put out to announce this made special effort to point out that every member of the core tour group had influenced at least one item in the clothing line. The big hint though was that during the tour break both UK Prince Harry and UK Prime Minister David Cameron made high profile visits to the US in what was meant to represent a ceremonial handing over of the reins that control Rihanna from the US to the UK. 

The problem is that despite the best efforts of the CIA handlers and sadly Rihanna herself part one of this plan has largely failed. Far from being confused by or made jealous of Rihanna most EU governments understand perfectly what is going on and view Rihanna as a victim to be pitied rather then punished. As such there is little will to attack her further meaning that the information handed to the UK by the US is of little value. However the UK along with other Monarchies still maintain a very hostile sentiment towards Rihanna that is driven largely by jealousy. Therefore the nations on the tour schedule can largely be divided into three risk categories with Tier 1 (T1) being medium risk, Tier 2 (T2) being low risk and Tier 3 (T3) being very low risk. Obviously the plan should be to maximise the amount of time spent in T3 nations while minimising the time spent in the T1 nations. At the risk of provoking a wave of b*tching, moaning and complaining the tiers are as follows;

T1; The UK, Belgium, The Netherlands, Switzerland and Sweden.

T2; The Republic of Ireland, Denmark, Monaco, Norway and Finland.

T3; Spain, Portugal, France, Germany and Poland.

That said EU politics are notoriously complex and interlinked. Therefore (in a totally made up example) in order to secure Romanian support for the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) element of the European Commission (EC) Budget France might have to show support for the Irish Republic's position on the horsemeat scandal by lashing out against Rihanna. As such the normal rules of illegal items being provided and held by citizens of the host nation, tour equipment moving to the next international border as soon as possible and zero contact with Chris Brown all still apply. Also as neither the tour promoter Live Nation nor the record company Roc Nation have provided me with a phone Rihanna really needs to follow me on Twitter in order to inform me about border crossings. That's because her role in EU politics is going to exert great pressure on African governments as they attempt to deal with the Mali problem.

The other major problem is going to be the three day break between the London, UK (16/6/13) concert and the Sunderland, UK (20/6/13) which will coincide with the very hot G8 Summit being held in Northern Ireland, UK. You see in their infinite wisdom the UK hosts of this year's G8 Summit have decided that it will be held in Northern Ireland during Protestant marching season. Therefore I cannot guarantee that it will be 100% riot free. However I'm pretty sure any antics will be confined to a roughly 1 square mile (1.6km^2) of Belfast where they all know each other anyway. Fortunately the summit itself will be held at the Loch Erne golf resort which is roughly 100 miles (160km) from Belfast and well if the hosts aren't paying for the delegates listed under the 1961 Vienna Convention to bring their own helicopter gunships then frankly they don't deserve to be a member of the G8 anymore.

Therefore I think it is totally unacceptable for Rihanna to be in the UK during this time. Fortunately due to the Channel Tunnel for less then USD300 Rihanna can be in Paris, France in under two hours of coming off stage in London. If  Live Nation were to splash out on a private jet she could be in Spain or Portugal in roughly the same amount of time. As non-members of the G8 either Spain or Portugal would be much better options especially as Portugal is so broke they'd probably be prepared to leave Rihanna the keys.

In the meantime I been to a wedding and sadly not picked up a certificate of wounding but I am intending to update my Twitter (@Sovereignaka) avatar. As for Rihanna apparently she still is on Twitter but seems intent on continuing to ruin her career by insisting that Instagram is still a good idea.

However I gather that she has mainly been set to work completing the video for the soon to be released video for "Pour It Up." This was of course was intended to interpreted as proof that the 'community containment' that keeps her away from Chris Brown is still working. In reality though the US is still largely a civilised country that has a very expensive criminal justice system that is more than capable of containing the threat that Chris Brown has presented to Rihanna since at least 2009. Therefore the real reason for the CIA handlers are forcing Rihanna to shoot the Pour it Up video is to further ruin her career. After all as I've said 1000 times of more that Pour it Up is really not the image of herself Rihanna wants to be presenting to the world while she's bankrupting herself in an effort to rob most of;  the EU, Africa and the Middle East.

Also I understand that Rihanna has been forced to spend a lot of time in the recording studio. Unofficially she's been ordered to license her brand in order to help fellow Roc Nation artist Wale sell his next album. However it was intended to be interpreted as further evidence that the 'community contaiment' is working while convincing everyone that Live Nation have accepted my point and need to end the Diamonds World Tour in Helsinki, Finland (28/7/13) and Roc Nation is already working on Rihanna's comeback album. The problem is that if Rihanna's next album is as poor as her last album "Unapologetic" and the "Diamonds" tour that supported it will be the final nail in her coffin. The second problem is that because that last album and this tour are so incredibly political the next album will have to be at least be a little political in order to address all those political faux pas. If the tour continues all the way until November 2013 (11/13) we will not even know what the questions are until at least December 2013 (12/13) let alone have found the correct answers in time for the Christmas sales.

There is of course a much more sensible solution but if Roc Nation haven't been given enough clues by now they really need to hurry up on that Lebanon line.


23:59 on 22/5/13

at 23:05 on 22/5/13 there is much more to come
at 23:25 on 22/5/13 I'm determining these to be considered footnotes.

at 23:55 on 22/5/13 there's just a tiny bit more.
at 00:40 on 23/5/13.

at 01:15 on 23/5/13 - See Footnotes*